Good taste, disappointing burn

This cigar looks and smells great.
With a price like this, its hard to pass up.
My big complaint against the stick is that the burn/draw is irregular; one side light up like a forest fire, the other puttered out, leaving me with a mis-shapen, odd looking smoke.
The taste was good. I typically smoke a full-bodied, but this 'medium' held its own.
I would buy the bundle again, if they can resolve the burn/draw issue.
This review was written about Famous Nicaraguan 4000 Toro
by Chris of Monroe on August 11, 2007

Novice Smoker

Good Cigar. Not great, but good. I prefer a sweeter tasting cigar, but even though this has a more traditional taste it is very smooth and is a good smoke for the price. I find the longer they sit in my humidor the better they are.
This review was written about Famous Nicaraguan 4000 Toro
by Jarod of NW Arkansas on May 23, 2007

Not the best

I have to say they were a little disapointing. They didn't burn too well, they were harsh and had very little aroma.
This review was written about Famous Nicaraguan 4000 Toro
by Vincent Caccavo of TN on May 15, 2007

EARLY RELEASE

CALL ME "SPOILED ROTTEN" BUT I MUST SAY I WAS A LITTLE DISSAPOINTED BY THE 4000'S. FIRST OF ALL....NO BANDS! I KNOW....WHAAAAAAA!!!!! BUT IT WAS THE TASTE THAT WAS SO UNCHARACTERISTIC OF YOUR FAMOUS NICARAGUAN LINE. IT TASTED VERY BITTER, SIMILAR TO THAT OF QUININE. MAYBE THE RELEASE OF THESE PURO'S WAS TOO EARLY. THEY MAY NEED A LITTLE MORE TIME TO AGE. WITH THAT BEING SAID OTHER MANUFACTURERS BEST CIGARS ARE NOT AS GOOD AS YOUR WORST CIGARS. YOU FOLKS DO A GREAT JOB. THANKS....BRUCE

Long Burn

This Cigar definitely has a long burn. However they kept my humidor dry. I removed them and the Humidity in the Humidor rose back to the correct level. They are a little harsh and have a deffinate "Bite" that may or may not be such a good thing.

View all 6 customer reviews
|