Showing 1 through 10 of 34 reviews
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Robusto Connecticut
"Super deal...I love them."
I just received these and smoked one right away. My last cigar was an H. Upmann Vintage Cameroon...I enjoyed this one better. Such an easy draw and lots of smoke even though I used a V cutter on it. Light gray to white ash and firm and pleasant cap. More relaxing than Ghurka and H. Upmann because I didn't have to struugle for a good draw. A consistant, even smoke with a toasty, woody taste with little to no pepper. It was VERY flavorful the first 1/3, I was surprised because it's supposed to be mild-medium. It's VERY well made, this may end up my every day smoke. I can't see how you could be disappointed. Famous hit a home run with this one! Thanks guys!
Mark in Florida
October 8, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Robusto Connecticut
"Great Smoke"
Very good smoke. Great volumes of smooth smoke with an easy draw,nice ash, and good tobacco flavor. My family approves of the aroma, but I could use a more powerful smoke. I heartily recommend these. Good tobacco flavor and my daily smoke. You cant beat the price. FSS is the best deal out there.
Moons boy in Tennessee
September 5, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Churchill Connecticut
"Phenomenal for the price"
I picked these up on a Cigar Monster grab, and I've loved them. I've smoked through over 10 of them, each had excellent draw, very smooth taste. I'll be picking some more up for sure.
cory in riverside, ca
August 10, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Robusto Connecticut
"Good value with inconsistent construction"
I enjoyed the cigars that didn't have a tendency to unravel.
Jeff S in cle
July 29, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Robusto Connecticut
"Worth the money"
I let these sit in the humi for a week before trying. A very good, consistent burn. Not much flavor, but not unpleasant either.
Will in Houston, TX
July 28, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Churchill Connecticut
"The worst cigar ever"
Well tonight I tried out the Nicaraguan 2000's. Starting with the first draw I was not impressed. The cigar had a harsh taste with not much flavor. After burning about an inch to a half of an inch the cigar began to taste better. After this the cigar, had a smooth smoke and taste finishing off with a decent taste and good smooth draw.
Rating: 3 / 5
http://huntingtoncountystogysmokers.blogspot.com/
CSPURGEON in Huntington,IN
July 10, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Churchill Connecticut
"The worst cigar ever"
Well tonight I tried out the Nicaraguan 2000's. Starting with the first draw I was not impressed. The cigar had a harsh taste with not much flavor. After burning about an inch to a half of an inch the cigar began to taste better. After this the cigar, had a smooth smoke and taste finishing off with a decent taste and good smooth draw.
Rating: 3 / 5
http://huntingtoncountystogysmokers.blogspot.com/
CSPURGEON in Huntington,IN
July 10, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Churchill Connecticut
"Nice!!!"
Nice even burn with a easy draw. Only one month in the humidor with the wrapper left on. A very pleasant smoke with a more even burn than some of my favorite premium brands.
Dale in Wisconsin
July 5, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Robusto Connecticut
"great value"
I am new to cigar smoking, while I have been trying some of the premier brands I must say this is an excellent smoke for the money. a tad harsher than the name brands, but if you are looking for an excellent every day smoke for a great price, these are quite a value. I defintely recommend this purchase
Scott in Long Island, NY
June 28, 2009
|
Famous Nicaraguan 2000 Toro Connecticut
"UNIMPRESSED"
After smoking the Nic 1000 and 3000, I wanted to try the Nic 2000. I found this stick to be at best mediocre. A very soft cigar with a crocked burn, moderate amount of smoke, OK aroma and not much flavor. Glad I got these very cheap on auction. The Nic 1000 is significantly better, as is the 3K.
Carl in Ohio
June 8, 2009
|
Loading...