Showing 1 through 9 of 9 reviews
|
Fonseca Vintage Churchill
"Nice Smoke"
This is the 2nd Fonseca Vintage Churchill I've smoked. It has been aged 3 months in my humidor. The 1st one was smoked immedately after purchase and was an enjoyable cigar. After aging the taste is better. It burns nice and slow with medium density white smoke. The drawn is smooth and easy with stable ashes. Aging has made a good cigar better. I'll add more to my humidor and enjoy them in a couple of months.
J Goldman in Indianapolis
October 2, 2008
|
Fonseca Vintage Churchill (4)
"one off the best"
one off my favorites.cool smoking,straight ash,perfect draw.but of course! it be a manny ceegar , he is the best!creamy,with touches of wood, hint of leather a dash of coffe... all the good things a vitage cigar is.every one should have a few sticks of these.
matthew in roanoke
September 15, 2008
|
Fonseca Vintage Lonsdale (Tube)
"Multifaceted Cigar"
This is one of the smoothest cigars, for the price, that I have ever smoked. In fact this lead to one of the problems I had with this cigar. It was so smooth and so mild, that I had a hard time identifying flavors at times. However, this was the only real problem I had with this smoke. The draw was good and didn't get tight near its end. The burn was slow and even. It took me a good hour to smoke this hefty lonsdale. For those who desire a great mild cigar for a modest price, the Fonseca Vintage Lonsdale may very well be for you.
Ryan B. in Maryville, Missouri
January 23, 2007
|
Fonseca Vintage Lonsdale (Tube)
"Super Smooth, Very Pleasing"
The Fonseca Vintage Lonsdale (Tube) was one of the first cigars I every smoked. Still to this day (6 years later) it's one of my most favorite. Always well constructed, never a hard draw, if you want a larger size mild cigar this is one to try.
D Holt in GA
April 4, 2006
|
Fonseca Vintage Robusto
"Short on flavor"
This cigar was very well constructed, but the taste was bland, one-dimensional and unsatisfying. The burn and draw were excellent, though it did not produce a great deal of smoke. It looked nice and had a pleasant aroma. I kept waiting for the flavor to intensify, but it didn't happen. What flavor there was was woody and somewhat grassy. As good as it looked, it was disappointing and I got bored with it. I wouldn't buy again.
PT in Troy, NY
March 9, 2006
|
Fonseca Vintage Lonsdale (Tube)
"Fonseca Vintage Lonsdale"
A friend brought me 2 Fonseca Vintage Lonsdales (tubes) back from vacation in the Keys. I loved them ever since, bought a box and going to savor them every Sunday for the Bucs game !! :)
Paul in Valrico FL
September 9, 2004
|
Fonseca Vintage Belicoso
"Quite tasty, not over powering, smooth after tast"
After being aged in my humidor for about 2 weeks, the burn was even and the draw was perfect. The cigar in itself was for the most part perfect. The flavor was not over powering, but did leave a smooth aftertaste. The taste was somewhat nutty mixed with a bit of a spice. Not sure of what the spice tasted like, but was well pleased in the taste. I would highly reccomend buying this cigar. My rule of thumb is the 70/70 for the humidor. 70degrees and 70% humidity. Best of luck and happy smoking!!! :-)
Darryl J Stoddard in Abington (South of Boston, MA)
June 25, 2004
|
Fonseca Vintage Robusto
"Smooth and mild but a little short on flavor."
I ordered a box of these a couple of months ago and have let them age in the old humidor. I've smoked five of them so far and have found them to be very well constructed and consistant. While they are a pleasant good drawing cigar, I feel they don't have the depth needed to call them a true winner.
Robert L. Rubalcaba in Rancho Mirage, California
March 7, 2004
|
Fonseca Vintage Lonsdale (Tube)
"This is a nice cigar!"
Well made, flavorful cigar. I'm about one-third of the way through a box and they have been consistently good cigars. The regular Fonseca line is pretty good -- the Vintage line is even better and worth every cent.
Charles Pascual in Palm Harbor, Fla.
June 12, 2003
|
Loading...