Showing 1 through 5 of 5 reviews
"i like the taste"
there is at lest one or two in ever pack that is row so hard you can not smoke
jim in elizabethtown ky February 14, 2015
I prefer Backwoods Sweet Aromatics to the 1882's, but the price makes the smoke a little nicer. Sometimes the 1882's taste too bitter for my liking... Tried the test flight of Ugly Coyotes. I usually dislike flavored cigars? the chocolates are delicious! BUT, with quality seemingly important once again to Backwoods, the Sweet Aromatics remain my favorite.
Sean in Maryland August 14, 2014
"GREAT EVERYDAY CIGAR"
WOW.. I love it. So does everyone else who bums one off of me. IMO,Its a much better smoke than Backwoods. Better quality control as well. Rarely do I need to correct the burn. Very good construction, taste and draw. My favorite cheroot.
RUSSELL in TEXAS January 29, 2014
"good to bitter"
OK to start but turn very bitter 1/2 way through
Scott in Upstate Big Apple January 15, 2014
"Better than BackWoods in every way"
First and foremost when compared to Backwoods. The GyV 1882 Sweet has some quality assurance Backwoods lack. All 40 of the GyV's I smoked had a proper wrap, none too tight, falling apart, and no holes. The flavor is slightly less sweet than the BW Sweet Aromatic which I also prefer.
Scott in June 29, 2013