|
|
Montecristo Churchill Reviews
[view details]
Showing 1 through 3 of 3 reviews
|
"great taste draw size and shape"
don t know what those guys were smoking, but for my money, these were classic monte's: great taste, draw, and while not inexpensive, great value
jimbo in ny February 13, 2009
|
"I would not buy these cigars for myself."
Very disappointing, not a very good cigar, not for the price. Kind of bitter, does not smoke well, leaves a bad taste after somkeing. Way, way over rated. I'll stick with the Onyx or Sancho Panzas.
Bobby in Carrollton, Ga. October 21, 2007
|
"Disappointing."
I was a little disappointed with these cigars. I've been smoking for years and of course had heard about the legendary Montecristo. I bought a couple 4-packs and I was just a little let down. Fine construction, perfect draw, and it tasted like a weed. Granted, I normally smoke maduros so I'm used to a robust cigar, but even compared to other naturals I though this one was a little bland. Maybe this Montecristo is merely riding the coattails of its Cuban counterpart, I don't know. At any rate, for $150/box, I can think of many other cigars I'd rather smoke.
Joe Barta in Cleveland, Ohio July 5, 2001
|
|
| 10 |
Burn (86) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Consistency (86) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Draw (86) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Appearance (86) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Taste (88) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Construction (88) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
|
|