|
|
Showing 1 through 3 of 3 reviews
|
"Ok cigar, but strong."
Good taste,good constuction,but a little to strong for me.
James Cole in Alabama November 22, 2006
|
"Good tasting cigar poor construction, falls apart."
This is a nice burning cigar, but the end lacks the wrapping that stands up to a good knock-out punch it just flakes apart, Good taste even burn, but construction prevents me from rating it higher then a 7.5 overall.
Jeffrey Weber-Reek in Neenah, Wi July 27, 2001
|
"Everyday, always"
Padron Palmas, 2000, 3000, 4000, Exec, Churchill, there just isn't a bad one in the bunch. I've been smoking cigars for nearly 10 years and continue to return to Padron. The 3000 is probably my favorite, assuming we're taking the Anniversario's out of the conversation. I'm a great fan of Nicaraguan cigars,Mayorga for one, but when I have a choice and in my humidor I always do, I pick Padron. 9.8 outta 10
Art Mathews in Cincinnati OH February 16, 2001
|
|
| 10 |
Burn (84) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Consistency (84) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Draw (87) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Appearance (86) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Taste (82) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
| 10 |
Construction (83) |
100 |
| Poor |
 |
Excellent |
|
|
|