Showing 11 through 15 of 15 reviews
"Not quite as good as the 1992"
Overall a very nice cigar. More subtle than the 1992. Very nice construction and burn is not bad for a box pressed cigar. Like most Rocky's the smoke is nice and creamy and the cigar is worth the price.
btg in Michigan March 9, 2008
As pricey and highly hyped as this cigar is one would expect it to be just about perfect. It's not and it's a shame. It is a tasty full bodied cigar. But, more often than not the burn is inconsistent with tunneling a frequent problem. Once a cigar starts to tunnel it's almost impossible to salvage it. When you have to throw away a cigar that costs $5 it becomes a $10 cigar.
For the money there are better choices out there.
steve banbury in arizona March 14, 2007
"Simply the best for the price !"
What can you say about these except "God what a cigar !" I have had Padrons anniversary's and these are every bit as good, just hope the price doesn't catch up to them, the look, burn and draw can't be beat, the taste is medium to full with an almost almond type woody flavor, hints of spice, its just a wonderful cigar, to good to smoke any time but I would!
J Cascone in MO December 30, 2006
This cigar i must say is very nice. I had the Excalubur's Maduro no. 2 as my number one but know I must say that the Rocky Patel Vintage 1990's are at the number one spot now. Keep some in the box.
Slim in Houston, Texas November 18, 2005
"Bueatiful cigar boxpressed, lots of wood and spice"
This cigar is rich and complex. Lot's of spice with some fruit are citrus on the end. Bueatiful construction, for some reason smoking this cigar made me think of the winter and seemed to go along quiet well with a med coffee.I would rate this stick 89. thanks
Bob Radford in Marietta,Ga. December 24, 2003