Saint Luis Rey Reviews
Showing 1 through 10 of 120 reviews
Saint Luis Rey Rothchilde (non cello)
"Surprise!! Why is it that cheap?"
Saint Luis Rey Rothchilde
Boy!! I never thought i would get such quality with less than $3 a stick. Although it's supposed to be full, but it is on the light side of full. Interesting complex flavor but not very rich. Nutty flavor with hint of a spicy earthiness but no other flavors that i could recognize. The flavor is consistant throughout the cigar which suggest not much recipe into it. Just a good quality wrapper and tobacco rolled to an everyday satisfaction. The only take on the cigar is the thick and huge cap which requires deep cutting but that doesn't effect the quality of the cigar. I've been smoking cigars for a while but got financially damaged from this tasty and sophisticated habit. So, I was looking for a cheap everyday cigar and boy I was in for a treat. I ordered 5 to try and am going to get a box for sure.
Cigarista in San Diego, CA September 28, 2012
"Don't Know What's Wrong With U Guy's"
Saint Luis Rey Rothchilde (non cello)
How could you not enjoy this C'GAR I say Hands down it has such flavor, strong start and finish's with a bold earth flavor how do they marry these leaves to get such a well balanced cigar, ***** 5 stars from me, I ordered 3 boxes today.
Chris in Simi Valley California February 13, 2012
"Excellent cigar for the price"
Saint Luis Rey Churchill
One of my favorite everyday or anytime smokes. Mild/slightly medium taste that's very consistent. Burn can sometimes be an issue, but that's the purpose of a lighter. Solid construction and I've never had a dud.
CM in Pittsburgh, PA December 1, 2011
"Have become less enjoyable"
Saint Luis Rey Titan
I have enjoyed this cigar for a long time, but the past few orders have literally left a bad taste in my mouth. Recent boxes have had inconsistent burn, unable to stay lit, and a harsh aftertaste. Locally purchase SLR's don't share these faults. What's up Famous Smokes?
Tim G in Houston November 21, 2011
"What's not to like??"
Saint Luis Rey Rothchilde
This is a fine smoke. I absolutely love them. I have had 2 boxes. Great for the patio in the evening with a good single malt scotch. They didn't burn hot, very consistent from on box to the next, draw was smooth.
Pete Tosi in Keizer, Or. July 28, 2011
"Very Disappointed"
Saint Luis Rey Titan
I was expecting a better taste and couldn't keep it lit.
Rod in Pa May 29, 2011
"Saint Luis Rey Titan - Great Cigar"
Saint Luis Rey Pequenos (10)
The Saint Luis Rey Cigars are excellent for the price. Much more could be listed for them. For those of you who deem them nasty and other negative comments, well, you obviously have never smoked a wide variety of sticks. This ex-special forces sergeant highly endorses them. Enough said!
Don in Mechanicville, NY December 30, 2010
"very cheap, poorly constructed and hard to smoke"
Saint Luis Rey Rothchilde (non cello)
I imagine from the outside this little cigar looks very tempting, but do not be fooled like I was. I understand this cigar is very cheap but I expected a little more. Not only is this little cigar very hard to draw and doesn't burn easily it is an all-around waste of money. In my opinion, be warned and, be very cautious. Looks can be deceiving, as I learned when I purchased this product.
Charlotte in Murfreesboro, Tennessee December 3, 2010
"Excellent smoke"
Saint Luis Rey Titan
My uncle turned me on to these; we found them by accident. Used to smoke Gloria Cubana Maduro R series regularly and we tried these. We just kept going back to them. These little smokes are consistently excellent.
Yeah there are one or two bad ones occasionally, but what cigar does NOT do that. I often light these when I am in a place that I might be interrupted, and end up loving the whole smoke hoping to NOT be interrupted.
They have become my "go to" smoke. The titans are also good, but these little smokes are as good and often burn as long or longer.
JC in Atlanta October 14, 2010
"Love them !"
Next
Very nice smoke for the price.
Scott L. in Clinton Co. Pa. September 22, 2010



